Acrylamide
The main chemical process that
causes this is known as the Maillard Reaction; it is the same reaction that
‘browns’ food and affects its taste.
Acrylamide forms from sugars and
an amino acid (asparagine) during certain types of high-temperature cooking,
such as frying, roasting, and baking (1, 2).
Breakfast cereals, bread,
biscuits and pastries. Roasted and ground coffee have all also been found to be
sources.
Effects on Health: At high levels Acrylamide is a neurotoxin and exposure to these high levels may cause symptoms such as numbness in the hands and feet.
Studies have shown that
acrylamide can be carcinogenic in
animals (3-5). It may also adversely affect the nervous system, pre-and
post-natal development and male reproduction.
Acrylamide caused cancer in
animals in studies where animals were exposed to acrylamide at very high doses.
In 2010, the Joint Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization
Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) concluded that acrylamide is a human
health concern, and suggested additional long-term studies.
Frying, Baking and Roasting at
lower temperatures and for shorter times reduce the amount of browning of the
product and reduce the amount of acrylamide produced. Some crisp manufacturers
have altered frying times and temperature to help with this reduction.
Providing appropriate cooking
instructions on frozen French fry packages to guide final preparation by
consumers and food service operators may help reduce acrylamide.
Potato Products
Selecting potato varieties that
are low in acrylamide precursors, keeping in mind seasonal variation, may help
with reduction.
Using treatments to reduce sugar
levels may help reduce acrylamide.
Cereal Based Products
Replacing ammonium bicarbonate in
cookies and crackers with alternative leavening agents while avoiding overall
increases in sodium levels may help to reduce acrylamide levels.
Coffee Products
Manufacturers should identify the
critical roast conditions to ensure minimal acrylamide formation within the
target flavour profile.
|
Acceptable
Limits/Levels according to Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/2158) |
|
|
Food |
Benchmark
Level [μg/kg] |
|
French
Fries (Ready to Eat) |
500 |
|
Potato
Crisps from fresh potatoes and from potato dough. Potato based crackers and
other potato products from potato dough |
750 |
|
Soft
Bread • Wheat
based bread • Soft
bread other than wheat based bread
|
50 100 |
|
Breakfast
Cereals (excluding porridge) • Bran
products and whole grain cereals, gun puffed grain • Wheat
and rye based products • Maize,
oat, spelt, barley and rice based products
|
300 300 150 |
|
Biscuits
and wafers Crackers
with the exception of potato based crackers Crispbread
Ginger
Bread Products
similar to the other products in this category |
350 400
350 800 300 |
|
Roast
Coffee |
400 |
|
Instant
Soluble coffee |
850 |
|
Coffee
Substitutes • Coffee
substitutes exclusively from cereals • Coffee
substitutes from a mixture of cereals and chicory • Coffee
substitutes exclusively from chicory
|
500 (2) 4000 |
|
Baby
foods, processed cereal based foods for infants and young children excluding
biscuits and rusks |
40 |
|
Biscuits
and rusks for infants and young children |
150 |
Reference
1. Tareke E, Rydberg P, Karlsson P,
Eriksson S, Tornqvist M. Analysis of acrylamide, a carcinogen formed in heated
foodstuffs. Journal of
Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2002; 50(17):4998–5006.
2. Mojska H, Gielecinska I, Szponar L.
Acrylamide content in heat-treated carbohydrate-rich foods in Poland. Roczniki Panstwowego Zakladu Higieny 2007; 58(1):345–349.
3. Fuhr U, Boettcher MI, Kinzig-Schippers
M, et al. Toxicokinetics of acrylamide in humans after ingestion of a defined
dose in a test meal to improve risk assessment for acrylamide
carcinogenicity. Cancer
Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention 2006; 15(2):266–271.
4. Fennell TR, Friedman MA. Comparison of
acrylamide metabolism in humans and rodents.
Advances in experimental medicine and biology 2005; 561:109-116.
5. Gargas ML, Kirman CR, Sweeney LM,
Tardiff RG. Acrylamide: Consideration of species differences and nonlinear
processes in estimating risk and safety for human ingestion. Food and chemical toxicology 2009; 47(4):760-768.

No comments:
Post a Comment